HOME | POLITICS | SPORTS | LIFE | SCI/TECH | OPEDS | HELPFUL TIPS
|
July 13, 2003 For those who grew up in Government Temples (aka public schools), there's a story in the Bible about two women who claimed one child as their own. A wise King, named Solomon, decided to have the baby cut into two pieces, one for each woman. One of the women thought this was a great idea, and thereby gave herself away. Now, some who went to Government Temples are already thinking, 'Boy, what a rotten guy that Sol was; He was probably a White Evangelical!' Well, not quite. King Solomon was the wisest man who ever lived, which means he knew human nature. He knew, if he set up a probable scenario, that just the thought of it would play off of the different characters standing before him. Yes, believe it or not, one of the women was lying. We must understand, however, that the phony mother was so-much more than a liar. That is, her ability to lie in such a bold-face fashion, meant she could do most any other rotten deed if given the opportunity. The word I'm thinking of is treacherous. The rotten deed is allowing a baby to be hacked-in-two. There are those who consider America as their child because it is a government of the people, or so it is said to be. Different people, with different viewpoints, claim ownership of this nation. Granted there are those who make no such claim. These have no interest in a healthy America, and no familiarity with its founding principles. Everything about America is foreign to them. The people I'm talking about could 'pass' for being related to America; their claim could be absolutely true. There is probable cause for believing that they love America, because their claim is not far-fetched. The question then arises as to why the lying woman would want the child and then, so quickly, agree to its demise. The answer is simple; there is a difference between loving a child and having an interest in its health. Having a child in the days of King Solomon meant having status and security, usually of the economic sort. Slaveholders, then and now, have a vested interest in the health of their slaves --- but it can't be said that they love the slave. As long as personal interests are in play, concern will be shown. The concern shown by some groups of Americans for America, is of a type at which I cast a dubious eye. Many, usually of the 'Liberal Persuasion', claim that America is theirs to save, and the DNA proof of this is their concern for America. These are those we see on the Evening News, contorted with the cares of the nation on their faces. They slather their deep concern from City Hall to the Courtroom. No one cares for America like they do, and no one will have it hacked-up quicker than they would. These frauds give themselves away when you see just what they will allow to happen to the child they claim as their own. Let me give an up-to-date example, which is apropos because of its immediate illustrative power. We all hear of the massive forest-fires out West, and how people who want to cull the forests are stopped from doing so. Those who claim to care for America's forests will not allow a proverbial hair-of-it's-head to be touched. Those who want to cut fire-breaks through the forests are attacked as destroyers of America; Capitalist criminals. Have you noticed how the self-appointed, tree-loving care-takers don't give a fig if the whole forest burns to the ground? These use their concern for the forests as a status symbol, and they don't want others to gain from the forest's bounty. The so-called environmentalists want the forests as theirs -- or as charcoal. It's not really their child; they are treacherous. There are many examples that can be given as to how those who claim to care for America, couldn't care less if it is hacked to pieces. Yet, what of the real mother; those who love America and what it was created as? They will not destroy it in order to save it. This leaves them at a disadvantage. The choices left to the lovers of what the Founding Fathers created are either to watch America go away with the opportunists or be destroyed. Their mouths are shut as to the truth; their love used as a muzzle. King Solomon must speak-up, he's wise and knows what's going on. You see, in the Bible story, the real mother didn't have to any-longer claim the child. Her King took-care of the lair, leaving the real mother with the child whom she loved. This is a complicated issue because life is complicated, but it is also a simple story, because a child can only have one mother. ------------ About the author: Joe Magoo is trained as a Theologian and Church Historian. He resides on Long Island, N.Y. He's in love with Ann Coulter, but she's seven feet tall, and Joe is only Five-Five. Email: joe572001us@yahoo.com Comment on this column in the forum. Tell a friend about this site! ------------ |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
