HOME | POLITICS | SPORTS | LIFE | SCI/TECH | OPEDS | HELPFUL TIPS
|
Dec. 30, 2004 With regards to the Article "Britney is a Skank". Yes, Britney Spears IS a Skank: However, it’s about high time you realized that. First off I’m not your average teeny-bopper fan, neither am I a big fan of Britney. In fact up until a couple of years ago I too wasted plenty of my time ‘hating’ on her. Then I realized that originally skank is reggae rhythmic dance (look in online dictionary) and that quite frankly, no matter how much I ‘hated’ on Britney it was hardly going to stop her from making money. Now, like you, I’ll admit that Madonna has ten times the class Britney ever will. On the other hand, if you can’t understand people’s fixation and humdrum over our little blonde bimbo, why are you contributing to it? So what if she was caught with her shoes of in a gas-station unisex bathroom? Have you never needed to pee really badly? Or for starters, has it actually ever occurred to you that Britney is HUMAN? Oh my Gosh! What a revelation in that! Speaking of Kevin Wotsit (her husband), granted that he’s probably not the ideal pick for a husband, who’s business is it if he wants Britney? I personally don’t think they’ll be married for any longer than 3 years, but people dump their wives and kids all the time for a younger, feistier girl. What’s the big deal if Kevin has? Is it because he did it for Britney? Had he done it for some so-called-conservative-singer such as Celine Dion, would your outlook be any different? I bet it would! Now, if I were Britney Spears I’d like a bit of privacy. Paparazzi shooting pictures of me every second when I didn’t even ask for it is NOT my problem. Arte you sure you’re a school teacher? Has it ever crossed your idle mind that those genital-grabbing pictures should have been printed in the first place? Britney is infringing no law giving her husband a little you-know-what, but editors should as sure as heck watch out for what they print. As far as I know printing such material is breeching the code of moral ethics. Why not have a go at the press who photographed her and printed her pictures without consent first? But of course you wouldn’t, you MUST hate on Britney Spears and make sure that such prorogation sends her fame flying through the roof even harder. As with regards to smoking: I’m sure not going to condone it, but It’s better then seeing her shoot up heroin, isn’t it? Let’s face it, Britney is in her early 20s and has long moved away from the squeaky clean image she portrayed in 1999. Yes – that was 5 years ago when she was 17 or 18. Even I’ve moved on since then – who wouldn’t. I’d certainly be disappointed if I still ‘hated’ on her 5 years after her first awful single was released. Which brings me to her musical evolution. I can’t speak for most of her rubbish – because indeed the music was horrid, but “Everytime” was one magnificent single. She just had to use her body to sell that one too, but I’d really like to know which woman on this earth doesn’t like to feel sexy. I’m sure that if I were to head out for a night in town, I wouldn’t wear a granny sweater and leggings. And if I knew that revealing a little flesh would up my income by a few grand, I’d hardly mind either! Now unravel the formula and apply it to yourself: what would you do? I will remain assured that you’d opt for the extra money, no matter how hard you deny it. After all, an exposed Britney-thong equates just as much money as a full-blown-porn-film by a amateur porn star does. Oh, and did I mention that while Britney is brushing her teeth she’s selling approximately $8,000 in merchandise and albums. Just in case you didn’t know and needed to chuck a little more salt into the weeping wounds. I won’t even get started on Religion. By now, your article has hit the abysses of hilarity. How on EARTH can you speak of Britney’s sins if you can’t figure out your own? There you are bashing someone, in a public manner, without never even having met them (thankfully maybe?). I’m not up to date with bible reading but I’m sure Jesus once said something on the lines of: “He who is sinless cast the first stone.” Maybe following that principle and indulging in some anger management classes would sort out these jealousy issues you seem to have no control over. Finally, I’m utterly disappointed that your vocabulary is so trite and repetitive. You’d think that someone teaching in a school would require a little more imagination besides “Skank, Skank, Skank.” There again, given your mindset, you’re probably going to call me a “skank” too. You see, as painful as it is, it is apparent that I posses a much bigger vocabulary than you do. ------------ About the author Alice Reid: Girl. 20. Writer. That's all there is to it. Email: atramentousaturn@yahoo.com Tell a friend about this site! ------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com and are not allowed to be posted on other websites. ARTICLE THIEVES WILL BE PROSECUTED! |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
