HOME | FUNNY ARTICLES | TOP NEWS REPORTS | SUBMIT
|
Oct. 10, 2009 According to the Los Angeles Times, the nominations for Nobel prizes had a deadline only eleven days after Barack Obama's inauguration as President of the United States. If that is true, it must have been agreed even before he had done a thing--and he still has done little--that he would be given the prize gratuitously. One can surmise only that the real reason he was given the prize is that he is Black. In other words, it can hardly have been anything other than a racist decision. Some Scandinavians have shown a penchant for groveling and fawning upon Blacks, for some reason that I do not understand. Do they see in abject prostration before Blacks a way to preclude a second Hitlerian invasion of Norway? Do they see in this sycophantic attitude a way of reproaching the United States for the bias and bigotry whereof America falsely accuses itself? It was bad enough that they gave a prize to Martin Luther King, lecher, plagiarist and woman-batterer, but at least King did do a little something, albeit far less than he is generally credited for. But Obama has done nothing at all in the way of nuclear disarmament. He has continued George W. Bush's idiotic confrontation with Iran over alleged violations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Iran, though a signatory of the treaty, which does allow the use of nuclear power for peaceful purposes, has been accused of secretly seeking to manufacture nuclear weapons. But there is no proof of this allegation. Repeatedly the International Atomic Energy Agency has affirmed that there is no nuclear weapons program in Iran, just as they affirmed was the case in Iraq in 2003. George W. Bush, brushing off the IAEA disdainfully, invaded Iraq and left hundreds of thousands dead. Will Barack Obama follow a similar course? Why isn't Obama threatening Israel with sanctions? They are the real villains in the Middle East. Israel has possessed nuclear weapons for decades, and yet the US had mounted no confrontation or sanctions against the Zionist state. They have not made aid to Israel contingent upon Israel's ratification of the NPT. The partiality towards Israel is due to the fact that many powerful Jews in the United States, like the Elders of Wall Street, the media moguls and government wire-pullers can largely control American politicians, even the president. They made puppets of Clinton and Bush, why not Obama too? They don't care if their servitor-in-chief is black or white. So Obama seeks to please Israel by persecuting Iran. Then what about India and Pakistan. India is firmly opposed to the NPT, because it is discriminatory. Why should India, with its billion people, play second fiddle to England and France, with their 50-60 million apiece? If there are four non-signatory nations that would be in clear violation of the NPT, if they had signed it, what is the point of getting tough with a signatory nation that is not in violation. If Obama believes his own diction, he is as moronic as his ignominious predecessor. ------------ About the author Thomas Keyes: I have written two books: A SOJOURN IN ASIA (non-fiction) and A TALE OF UNG (fiction), neither published so far. I have studied languages for years and traveled extensively on five continents. Visit my website here. Email: udikeyes@yahoo.com Comment on this article here! 
------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com and are not allowed to be posted on other websites. ARTICLE THIEVES WILL BE PROSECUTED! |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
