|
October 28, 2008 The world would be a better place if the American right wing had never
existed. Thousands of Americans and Iraqis would still be alive, tens of
thousands or Iraqis would still be living in their own homes. The American
economy would not have hopped from bubble to bubble if the right wing had not
put all of their faith in deregulation, and American jobs would not have been
sent abroad. Our tax dollars would not have flowed upward into the coffers of
the rich, and the war machine would not comprise such a large part of our
economy. We would have retained the respect of other nations, and not aroused
the absolute hatred of those we have attempted to bomb into submission. We
would get along better with one another if the right wing had not used tribal
hatreds to arouse their base against black people, immigrants, liberals, and
the well-educated. Our infrastructure, health care, and schools would be better
if the billions spent on futile wars had been spent on domestic needs. The
planet would be a better place if our addiction to oil had been broken 25 years
ago. But the issue goes deeper even that these practical matters. We would, in
fact, be happier people if the right wing had not terrorized us with their horror-filled
systems of belief. The Friedmanites are bad enough -- in their world, there are
only winners and losers. Everyone deserves what they get, and if a child who
gets melamine in his milk is a victim of "creative destruction",
well, too bad, because some rich person is getting a little bit more money. In
the capitalist world, you are not just supposed to starve, you are supposed to
deserve starving -- insult added to injury, humiliation added pain. Of course,
as Naomi Klein has shown, the "free market" is never free at all, it
is fixed, by dictators and armies and oligarchs. But the thrust of the
propaganda stands. We may call this the "Phil Gramm Position". As bad as this is, far worse has been the effect of religious
fundamentalism on the individual spirit and the national mood. By now, we all
know some child (or former child) who has been terrorized by "the
Rapture" -- who has come home after school to an empty house, only to
panic because he or she is convinced that everyone else has been "raptured
up." The left behind one has to reckon with the idea that not only is
everyone he or she loves gone, he or she has done something wrong according to
Jesus, and failed to deserve salvation. I call this child abuse. The religious
right has been determined to enforce the unhappiness of others, no doubt so
that that unhappiness will match their own. After all,
they want to make sure that gay people understand that no matter how much they
pay in taxes, they are second class citizens. They also want to make sure that
every woman in the world understands that her interests are secondary to those
of any embryo, any man, even, indeed, any sperm cell.
This would be the "James Dobson Position". The God of the right wing, and of the Bible, is a pretty arbitrary guy. He
lays down the rules, but you can get those boils or those locusts even if you
didn't knowingly do anything wrong, in fact, even if you didn't do anything
wrong at all. Your personal God could punish you for something someone else
did, as in the Bible he frequently punishes the enemies of This is the world we have been living in for the past thirty years. In a week, we have a chance to leave this world behind. If we look at our
two candidates, the differences between them are stark. John McCain, who was
raised by and accepts the authoritarian model, is evidently never at peace. He
is hot-headed, erratic, and has been remarkably cruel. He claims to have
principles, but his principles change every time he loses his cool. The more he
is pushed, the more it becomes evident that he lives by his own selfish desires
-- for money, for power, for women. He's is a classic avoider, who can't even
answer the simplest question -- if something "unpleasant" comes up,
he changes the subject. Barack Obama rarely changes the subject, because he is
fully capable of looking at an issue and considering it. He seems to have been
reared in a non-authoritarian household, by a loving mother and loving
grandparents. He thinks that the world is a rational place that can be
understood and modified. His own family seems happy and loving. Right wingers
think he is shallow, but he isn't shallow -- he's well-adjusted. And we've had
two whole years to poke him and prod him and discover this. Obama has grown
through campaigning because he has learned from it. McCain gets ever smaller
and more weird as he campaigns because he doesn't
understand what is happening to him. When we choose between these two men, we
are choosing between two worlds -- the world of ignorance, fear, manipulation,
and cruelty, and the world of rational investigation, weighing of options, and
planning. This world is a world where sexual preference is not such a big deal,
salvation is not an eternal mystery, and life goes on. It's a world where bad
things happen, but there is no malign Godly intention behind them. It is world
that understands the temptations of human nature and attempts to deal with them
rationally and systematically. Some of these attempts will fail, but on
balance, not as many as have failed in the last twenty-five years. Most of my friends see the coming election as the most important we have
known. The right wing has damaged our country, our livelihoods, our national
honor, and our planet, but not yet fatally. If McCain gets elected, that could change. ------------ About the author: Katie Barthadoor is a housewife living in Yonkers, with two beautiful children and a pet Rottweiler who loves to have conservatives over for dinner. Email: kissmekate8@yahoo.com Comment on this article here! ------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com. Please link to this article rather than copying and pasting it onto your site (which would be unauthorized and illegal). |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|