|
June 10, 2008 Historically speaking, whenever the national electorate is offered a genuine Democratic Party candidate versus a Republican campaigning as a Democrat for the office of President, the former always wins the election. This year the Republican candidate will do his very best to proverbially snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. But, an often unmentioned factor, to be covered later below, will get the approximately 5%to 7% margin of victory for the Democratic Party candidate. This will easily balance off the same general percentage of Hillary Clinton supporters who still might not vote for Obama in November. The true choice before the voters, nonetheless, will be a man of the hard Left versus a man of the soft Left because in America there are — predominantly as politicians — mainly rightwing Socialists (e.g., McCain) and leftwing Socialists (e.g., Obama) disguised under various euphemisms. Politically ignorant people such as Michael Medved contend that politicians such as Ronald Reagan had actually won their national campaigns by (supposedly) appealing to the voters as true moderates; this is manifestly utter nonsense and bullfeathers . Pat Buchanan, among others, knows that only promoted political polarization, a clear Right vs. Left, had, in fact, won the day for both Richard Nixon and Reagan, both of whom, of course, he had worked for and knew. George W. Bush won both his elections against explicit Leftists, meaning Al Gore and Bob Kerry. As a much better instance, Reagan, e.g., was mostly despised and, thus, hated in the 1970s and 1980s, meaning by the opposition and their supporters in the mass media, etc., as just a nuclear war-mongering nut case and simple-minded reactionary! If there is any doubt, go back and read what was then actually said and written about him; Medved’s extremely faulty memories, in contrast, are greatly unreal and, thus, so untruthful. The vast majority of Liberals and, especially, most Leftists usually hated, more or less, Reagan’s old guts. Medved’s advising McCain to deliberately run, therefore, as a moderate will inevitably lead to a much well-deserved defeat. As clear and accurate historical examples of this rather obvious political truth, Gerald Ford, George W. Bush, in his second run, and Bob Dole had all deliberately campaigned as basic moderates and – guess what? – they all very predictably lost. Q.E.D. What is the dumb [read: Center-Left] McCain political strategy for November? Well, he has often manifested open contempt (putting it rather mildly) for the main conservative base of his own party, many members of whom are greatly disinclined (as an understatement), in turn, to vote for this clearly RINO, maverick Republican. He absurdly appears to be following Medved’s advice to move to the assumed “Center” (read: moderately Left) as the “best” way to supposedly win in the general election this November. What will most likely occur? A significant (enough) number of Republicans, being those conservatives (read: ignorant fools) he truly holds in known contempt, will not, therefore, vote for McCain; this will surely cost him the election by producing at least just enough non-votes for the critical margin of failure. John McCain will end up, during his retirement years after losing (prediction: about 45% to 55%) to Barack Obama, being mostly clueless in his home state of Arizona; he will still wonder with puzzlement, many years later, why he had lost to Obama; he will never be able, even upon attempts at reflection, to accurately fathom why so many Republicans simply despised him so greatly as to have cost him the presidential election. Among others, Rush Limbaugh, though he claims publicly that his Operation Chaos is really meant to just ostensibly help McCain, still publicly acknowledges that McCain had (illegitimately)won his Republican primary victories by having gotten votes from about 50% of non-Republicans, meaning independents and Democrats, who, the majority of them, will not, in fact, be voting for him for President. The Democratic Party, in its turn, will definitely see to it that Obama gets the nomination to avoid charges of racial prejudice by, also, then avoiding race riots if he were somehow or other wrongly denied the nomination; the factor of White guilt, nevertheless, will provide just enough extra votes to put Obama over the top to secure the presidency. The charismatic, young, dynamic-looking, future-promising Obama (who looks like a winner)will easily outshine the dull, aged, old news, and reactive McCain (who’s trying to be a winner) in this very media conscious era. Why the factor of White guilt as the pivotal “block” vote that will come to ultimately secure Obama’s election? Many years ago, there used to be a great deal of political and social talk about the never-really-occurring phenomenon of what used to be called the ever expected “massive White backlash” against all of the modern civil-rights movement, forced bussing, integration, affirmation action, etc. After each such political episode, Liberals and Leftists and even many Conservatives had often solemnly warned about what would, thus, inevitably happen to put a complete or nearly complete end to all such racial engineering or such cognate goals in America. Well, guess what, the once very widely predicted, massive White backlash, ever expected, ever awaited, NEVER really happened and, moreover, will not occur. Although judges, and not democratic votes, have secured the main racial engineering efforts, it has been White guilt that has and will fully sustain Leftist ideology in this matter, in also the election of Obama who will benefit greatly from the aforementioned feeling of absurd racial guilt. And, as a further logical political prediction, Obama will seek and, moreover, easily get from a Democrat-controlled Congress racial reparations for slavery. Thus, his truly momentous election will be a notable event in more ways than one as America, filled by a massively growing White guilt fueled by self-hate, runs down the clear path of decadence and decay, along with so-called same sex “marriages,” of course. The American people tend, too often, to go to extremes about the subject of reform in society. Almost all of the same interests that had once called for, e.g., Prohibition had eventually ended up supporting yet another constitutional Amendment to later get rid of it. There is the unfortunate tendency to throw out the proverbial baby along with the bath water, to go to various extremes of behavior or attitudes. Instead of just attempting to eliminate racial barriers that had once legally and wrongly been erected as with Jim Crow laws that made second-class citizens of some people, there is the declared (Leftist) ideological need for promoting multiculturalism, meaning reversed racism and a euphemism for anti-White racism. It is meant to attempt the ideological insanity of so-called retroactive “justice” when all of the original participants to a situation or condition are all long dead, meaning slavery in America. It is one thing to rightly and morally hate racism; it is yet another matter entirely to encourage a form of racial hatred in the very name of fighting racism. [Of course, it is almost always forgotten that there were also White slaves, those often classified as criminals, shipped unwillingly to North America in at least the tens of thousands.] But, Obama, as the racial candidate supreme, is to be the vanguard for reparations, as, once again, the American people go to an extreme. Consequently, McCain and Obama will, in effect, be mainly campaigning past each other with no real contact of ideas as, supposedly, the former represents the past and the latter the future; McCain won’t know what hit him due to the two above explained factors: his basic abandonment of the conservative base of his own party (which he wrongly thinks he can do with impunity) matched to the tremendous symbolism, empowered by sickly White guilt (a kind of [not so] secret weapon) , of electing the first African-American as President. It will be one of the most potent triumphs of multiculturalism during this current phase of the decline and fall of the West. ------------ About the author: Joseph Andrew Settanni, CRM, CPC is a Certified Records Manager and Certified Professional Consultant with 30 years of professional experiencein data, archives, records and information management. Email: mkeegan311@earthlink.net Comment on this article here! ------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com. Please link to this article rather than copying and pasting it onto your site (which would be unauthorized and illegal). |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|