HOME | POLITICS | SPORTS | LIFE | SCI/TECH | OPEDS | HELPFUL TIPS
|
Apr. 15, 2008 I've spent a great deal of time in the last few months studying the three principle candidates for the Presidency. I've decided NOT to vote for Sen. Obama because he's spent his entire campaign insulting my intelligence. For example, it's massively insulting for him to try and convince me that he spent 20 years in a pew at The Reverend Mr. Wright's church and can't recall him saying anything "controversial." It's insulting for him to say that he now disagrees with every racist, hateful, America-hating, whitey-blaming thing to spew from this guy's mouth over a 20-year period in a church that practices "Black Revolutionary Theology" which was INVENTED by the KGB and their surrogates as a means to drive a wedge between the races in the Western Hemisphere back in the '60's, and preaches such discredited ideas as redistributionism as a means to "equalize" a country's wealth. Anyone who REALLY disagreed with that nonsense would have walked out the door 19 and a half years ago. No, Senator Obama, you won't be getting my vote regardless of your rhetorical abilities and high-flown ideas about "unity" and "hope" and "change." You haven't practiced a single one of those things throughout your public life and I simply don't believe that you will if elected President either. Instead, I believe we'll see more and more lavish lionizing of people like Mr. Wright and his buddy Louis Farrakhan. I'll be pleased when we eventually have a black President, but Dr. Thomas Sowell simply isn't available and until he or someone of equal stature is, it probably won't happen quite yet. Sen. Obama is glib and slick, but he isn't fit to light Dr. Sowell's pipe. I won't be voting for Senator Clinton either--for much the same reasons. Her entire public life she's insulted my intelligence by claiming not to have known about her husband's penchant for philandering. If she didn't really know, then she's too stupid to be President because almost every other man, woman and child over the age of 5 in the State of Arkansas knew about it almost from the day he moved into the Governor's mansion. Also, she insults my intellect every time she spews that nonsense about "vast right-wing conspiracies" out to "get" her husband. There didn't need to be any "conspiracy." Her husband "got" himself into that mess because he couldn't keep his pants zipped, couldn't restrain himself from leering at every attractive woman he encountered, and then lied his eyeballs out...even after been sworn to tell the truth. She seems to have absorbed that tendancy to lie, even if the truth would suit her purposes better--perhaps from simple proximity and by osmosis. Anyone dumb enough in the midst of a bitter fight for her Party's nomination who'd lie about being shot at in Bosnia when her arrival there was filmed, either thinks that the mainstream media wouldn't DARE show the truth or that she still had them in her back pocket so they wouldn't WANT to show the truth. In either case, Ms Clinton is too dumb and/or naive to be President. I'll be happy to see a woman President one day, but Maggie Thatcher isn't eligible because she isn't a citizen and until some woman of equal ability runs, we probably won't see it happen. Ms Clinton certainly isn't fit to wash out Ms Thatcher's pantyhose, let alone follow her into the pinnacles of political power. So, I've decided to vote for Senator McCain this November. He's flawed, to be certain. He is 'way too anxious to be "liked" by his enemies in the DNC and the Mainstream Media, and has bent over backwards to give them the farm from time to time. His "Gang of 14" fiasco is ample proof of that, even if you are willing to overlook the disaster that was the McCain-Feingold stupidity or the McCain-Kennedy immigration "reform" nonsense. Also, he's well-known for having a vicious temper. Aha! At last something I can admire. To be perfectly honest, I'd rather have someone prone to flying into rages in charge of "The Button" than someone who thinks problem States can be curtailed by "dialogues" or giving them money. If nothing else, it will probably give people like Chavez, Osama bin Laden, Kim or Hussein pause before pulling some of the shenanigans they're prone to pull. "What if this guy's sleeping next to the button and his alarm-clock goes off? With his temper, he might just roll over, push the button and go back to sleep and we'll all be in deep trouble." Besides, the torture he endured at the hands of the North Vietnamese (not the phony "torture" he thinks we're doing to jihadist prisoners like making them wear women's panties on their heads) has got to have affected him psychologically and he might just fly into one of his famous rages and decided to take all of 'em out at once. THAT'S the guy I'd rather have in charge. One that scares the pee-waddly-doodle out of our enemies instead of someone who wants to "understand" them better. ------------ About the author: David A. Jared is a news junkie, semi-retired and an avid golfer who's been writing his first book, "4000 years of chopsticks" for the last 20 years. Email: jaredland@sbcglobal.net ------------- All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com and are not allowed to be posted on other websites. ARTICLE THIEVES WILL BE PROSECUTED! |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
