|
May 27, 2007 I saw Star Wars and 2001: A Space
Odyssey each once, in the 1970’s in So when Frederick Smith pops these words and
phrases, like ‘hyperspace’ and ‘warp drive’, into his
articles, it scares me, because I think that he must have much more
sophisticated information at his fingertips than I. So I check it out online, and find out
that ‘warp drive’ and ‘hyperspace’ came, not from NASA,
not from Einstein, not from some astronomical observatory, but from television,
more precisely, from Star Trek.
No wonder I don’t know about it! I don’t watch television,
and for the very reason that it is false.
Immediately, I get the mental picture of Frederick Smith, with his wife
and children, curled up before their TV set, with pizza, popcorn and soft
drinks. Being aged and alone, I
guess I can envy him his blissful family life there in the Even such phenomena as
‘four-space’, ‘space curvature’, ‘time dilatation’,
‘black holes’ and ‘worm holes’, though they have been
mooted about by the scientific community for generations, are very unlikely to
play any significant role in any imaginable space travel that the human race
may undertake in decades or even centuries. At 86.6% of the speed of light, time dilatation
amounts to 50%, which means that people aboard a spaceship
moving at that high speed would live two years while only one year was elapsing
for the people watching them from planet Earth. That of course is a considerable
gain. But at 3% of the speed of
light, time dilatation amounts to 99.95%, which means that the people on the
ship would live one year and four hours, while the tellurian observers lived
one year. So time dilatation
doesn’t enter as a significant factor into any kind of space travel that
we can expect in the foreseeable future.
We can’t even expect 3% of the speed of light for the
present. That would be 130 times
faster than our current top speed. Wormholes, which are theoretical shortcuts
through space, exist so far only on paper, the result of the manipulation of
equations. These may arise in
conjunction with very heavy bodies called black holes, which consist of so much
mass that all light, matter and gravitational fields in the region are drawn
inescapably into them. However, the
likelihood that there are any black holes or worm holes in any region of space
that earthly astronauts could expect to reach, even at 10% of the speed of
light, within centuries or even millennia is negligible. So it is utterly pointless to
invoke them, as Smith has done, in a discussion of the human conquest of space. Similarly, four-dimensional distances in no way
abolish the three-dimensional distances that astronauts would have to
traverse. The four-dimensional
distance between Alpha Centauri in 1996 and the Earth in 2000 is 0, but the
three-dimensional distance remains 4 light-years, and that is what we would
have to cross. The sort of space that we would be navigating,
that is, a region with a radius of say 100 light-years, in which our speed
would be 10% the speed of light or likely much less, will prove to be very
Newtonian, with no curvature, no black holes, no worm holes, no dilatation, no
four-space geodesics, no warp drive, no hyperspace. Any two points within that
100-light-year sphere will have a very definite topological distance function
that nothing will ever circumvent.
If point A is 17.2185 light-years from point B, there is absolutely nothing
that will change the distance. And
there will never be a way to travel it by going less than 17.2185 light-years. ------------ About the author Thomas Keyes: I have written two books: A SOJOURN IN ASIA (non-fiction) and A TALE OF UNG (fiction), neither published so far. I have studied languages for years and traveled extensively on five continents. Email: udikeyes@yahoo.com Comment on this article here! ------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com and are not allowed to be posted on other websites. ARTICLE THIEVES WILL BE PROSECUTED! |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|