HOME | POLITICS | SPORTS | LIFE | SCI/TECH | OPEDS | HELPFUL TIPS
|
July 7, 2006 Ashton Williams of the AP reported: “Hu protestor faces harassment charge” where Ms. Wang Wenyi interrupted the welcoming of Communist Chinese President Hu Jintao. She was charged “with a misdemeanor of willingly intimidating, coercing, threatening and harassing a foreign official.” I thought about that too. American foreign officials get “harassed” all the time and no one ever gets arrested. Protestors heckle Don Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice and dick Cheney and the President. They may be escorted out of the venue but they are not arrested. Wang Wenyi has a legitimate gripe against the oppressive government of the Chinese. It is interesting that she would be arrested and charged instead of having her constitutional right to freely speak her mind defended and protected. Liberals who speak against America and are pro-China are defended all the time by the liberal press. Ms. Wenyi is being hung out to dry for being against a government that does not allow personal freedom. With that undiplomatic event well behind us I cut out a May 7th article: “Bush approach to diplomacy is criticized” by Jonathan S. Landay and Warren P. Strobel of “Knight Ridder”. I had to laugh because the article was slanted toward “unilateral” diplomatic approaches to Iran and North Korea. Quote: “Republicans and Democrats are calling on the White House to offer direct talks.” I remember all the hand-wringing by liberals about the “unilateral” approach to the Iraq campaign and how the United States needed a bigger coalition and United nations approval before pressing the issue against world terrorism. Now the President is insisting on multilateralism in diplomatic efforts and he is criticized for not considering “unilateralism” in approaching the rogue governments. The hypocrisy is astounding. On May 10th I cut out: “US releases insurgents’ “Baghdad Strategy” by Joseph Giordano of the Stars and Stripes because of the first and last paragraphs. First: “ The American military command in Iraq…released what it says are the “Baghdad Strategy” and the “Baghdad State of Affairs” as seen by Al-Qaida…the documents purport to show a weakening group that is lacking “leadership, military capability and Iraqi support…” Last: “There was no way…to independently verify the authenticity of the documents.” The documents show how badly we were kicking terrorist butt and how al-Zarqawi was worried, but the media did not bother to “verify” the documents like CBS “verified” the forged documents concerning the President’s National Guard Service, or the rewritten “Downing Street Memos”, or the FBI memo Dick Durbin “embellished” on the floor of the Senate; calling American soldiers, Nazis! That same day: “Moussaoui’s bid to change plea is denied” by AP reporter Michael J. Sniffen explained how Zacarias Moussaoui was “extremely surprised” at his life sentence. The Islamic bone-head thought surely the American jury would get him virgin-ized, but the bone-headed jury decided to let old Zacarias eat three squares on the taxpayer’s teat for the remainder of his miserable Islamic prayer life. On May 14th I saw the article: “IAEA director: Watch for terrorists, not Iran” by AP (no byline) and I had to smile broadly at the sheer idiocy of the statement. The land that gave us 444 days of terrorism during the Carter Presidency; the land that sponsored the destruction of the Kobar Towers and the United State’s mission to Lebanon; the land that backs Hezbollah and trains whole battalions of homicide killers; the nation planning the nuclear homicide killing of Israel is not to be watched but more subjected to a “diplomatic” solution. Iran has rejected every diplomatic overture that does not allow them to continue building a nuclear arsenal. I just wanted to write that IAEA Director Mohammed El Baradei is a bigger idiot than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (Iran’s answer to Ward Churchill.) I had to laugh again on May 24th with the article: “Designer of new war used web to spread strategy for jihad” by Craig Whitlock of the Washington Post. A full two columns long, the article told me: “Last October the writing career of Mustafa Setmarian Nasar came to an abrupt end…”; which was great because Nasar is billed as: “the Spanish-Syrian al-Qaida strategist [who] published thousands of pages of internet tracts on how small teams of Islamic extremists [Canada 17, US 7] could wage a decentralized global war against the United States and its allies.” Then the article went on to tell me about this entire terrorist’s master writings by title and where on the web to find them and how wonderfully smart this guy is on behalf of terrorists everywhere! Thanks Craig! A short article out of California: “School officials appeal exit exam to high court” told me that California developed a “high school exit exam” that had to be passed in order to graduate from school. A judge got involved and “suspended” the requirement for the exam. The reasoning was that the exam “discriminated against poor students and those who are learning English”. Now the question is, why? Are the “poor” students not being taught the same subjects as the “rich’ students? Are “those who are learning English” going through 4 years of high school without being properly taught English? The inability of “thousands” of students to pass an “exit exam” is a direct reflection on the teachers and the school curriculum and the inability to properly instruct the “poor” and the foreign born. The liberal answer is to suspend the test and allow yet another inadequately trained group of teenagers to graduate into mediocrity. Thank you Judge Robert Freedman! ------------ About the Author: Michael John McCrae has contributed over 500 articles to Useless-Knowledge.com. Email: macswordV@hotmail.com Comment on this article here! ------------ All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com and are not allowed to be posted on other websites. ARTICLE THIEVES WILL BE PROSECUTED! |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
