HOME | POLITICS | SPORTS | LIFE | SCI/TECH | OPEDS | HELPFUL TIPS

Useless-Knowledge.com
Articles


U-K Moderator Acts Like a Nerk

By Tom Pain
Dec. 31, 2006

In the past several weeks, I have suffered a U-K Moderator’s arrogant attacks. Like many on this site, this person believes his/herself to be completely right about any and all subjects, and will never admit error, even with the proof of his/her error obvious to all.
 
When our battles amounted to nothing more than this person being an idiot and my exposure of his/her idiocy to the readers, it was fun. It was a fair fight, in the sense that we both wielded the same weapon – our keyboards. It was unfair in every other way. Unfortunately, my opponent is no match for my writing and debate skills, or intelligence, even though my skills and intelligence are very, very average. Each battle unfolded in the same way:
 
  1. This person was stupid; I exposed.
  2. This person denied without offering evidence, I confirmed with solid, overwhelming evidence.
  3. This person ignored what I said and called me "mean," I repeated my original accusation and supporting facts, and demanded that either he/she provide contrary           evidence/logic, or admit he/she was wrong.
  4. He/She disappeared.
  5. Shortly thereafter, the process starts over.
 
This is very typical behavior of those I expose on this site. I have easily rebutted over 100 articles or posts on this site. I can count on one hand the number of authors who have responded with a logical, factual defense of their words. Over and over, the liars and distorters I expose choose to evade and ignore. I was not surprised that our Moderator would do the same, I expected it. The main reason I post on this site is to expose this kind of scum.
 
However, my joy ride has been derailed in the last couple of weeks by our Low Class Moderator introducing an unfair weapon into our battles. In an astonishing lack of personal ethics and integrity, our Moderator has taken the editing power entrusted to him/her as a Moderator and used it for his/her own personal vendetta.
 
Citing some absurd and imaginary rule that there can be no New Topics introduced in the Rebuttals section that do not, IN HIS/HER JUDGMENT, relate to an article on the main forum, and a second imaginary rule that there cannot be two different threads on the same subject … our Moderator has deleted my posts. Citing the many examples of threads that break this rule but are still allowed would mean nothing to this idiot.
 
Everyone knows that the Moderator role was created to limit abuse of the Rebuttals section. The site was experiencing spammers and obsessed Natalie Holloway psychos who would invade every thread. There was also some over-the-top insulting being done, but this was a minor problem since the Rebuttals section was specifically created as a haven for the "spirited" debate that had taken over the main forum.
 
My posts were not spam. They were not invading other threads. They contained no over-the-top insults. Our Moderator deleted them anyway. Here’s an example:
 
A U-K article was written in 2006 making a stupid football prediction. It came to pass that the prediction was proven wrong, so a Rebuttal thread was started declaring it the Worst Prediction of 2006. Knowing that I had made a prediction that was also proven wrong this week, I posted a New Topic – Worst Prediction of 2007 and admitted my error.
 
Our Moderator deleted that Topic because "There is already a thread for worst predictions and there was no original article preceding it."
 
DO WE REALLY NEED MODERATORS INVENTING THESE STUPID RULES AND TAKING IT UPON THEMSELVES TO DELETE NON-OFFENSIVE POSTS.
 
If you haven’t guessed it, our Moderator was the one who made the stupid prediction and he’s mad because his low self-esteem cannot stand to be wrong. The real reason he deleted my New Topic is that it referred to his stupid prediction.
 
Soooo, to my fellow U-K contributors, and to our esteemed Editor, I can’t stop this pathetic Moderator from acting like U-K God with the power you’ve foolishly given him, but I can expose him as the corrupt liar that he is.
 
According to the rules this Moderator has imagined, Rebuttals cannot be posted unless they reference an article from the main forum. So, in the future, I am going to reference this article many times, about many different aspects of it. When you see this Moderator deleting my posts anyway, you’ll know that he’s lying and that the real reason he deletes is that he has no self-respect.
 
Look for Rebuttals that address these topics, they’ll be referring to this article:
 
  1. What is the meaning of life? Please tell me.
  2. Is there a God or not? Please tell me.
  3. Is war necessary? Please tell me.
  4. Are the Republicans bad? Please tell me.
  5. Are Democrats bad? Please tell me.
  6. Has Bozo the Clown ever had sexual relations with a middle-aged balding white person from California ? I’ve seen pictures that prove he has.
  7. Does it take more talent to write shallow, but "original," articles about meaningless cultural events that target readers with an 8th grade education, or does analyzing articles and political speeches for truth and accuracy require more "talent?" Most people tell me that the junior high schools students can write cultural drivel as well as what we see here on U-K.
  8. What is the meaning of lying? How do you recognize written lies? Can you provide any examples of lies in U-K articles? Please tell me.
  9. What is the meaning of distortion? How do you recognize distortion? Can you provide any examples of distortion in U-K articles? Please tell me.
  10. Are some people stupid? Can you cite examples of stupidity on U-K? Please tell me.
  11. Are all Emmy winners gay racists with shrunken genitals? It would appear so. Please tell me.
  12. What are some good sports teams? Please tell me.
  13. What is your favorite color? Please tell me.
  14. Do you like black people? Whites? Hispanics? Asians? Please tell me.
  15. What do you think of Islam? Please tell me.
  16. What do you think about the Iraq war? Please tell me.
  17. Who’s going to win future elections? Please tell me.
  18. Do you like celebrities? If so which one? What do you think of other celebrities? Please tell me.
  19. Are there any subjects that you want to discuss, but can never find anyone to listen? Please tell me.
  20. If you shoved an Emmy up Bozo’s Big Top, would he like it? Please tell me.
  21. If you read an arrogant liar’s words, would you think of Pat Hurley? Please tell me.
  22. What are some bad sports predictions you can think of? Please tell me.
 
There, that probably gave me some room in the Rebuttal Section for awhile. I sure hope so; the only other alternative I have is to start posting stupid lies and meaningless cultural drivel as well.
 
Trust me – you don’t want to see that.

------------

About the author Tom Pain: Just an American boy with so much common sense, it hurts.

Email: thomas.pain@hughes.net


Comment on this article here!

------------

All articles are EXCLUSIVE to Useless-Knowledge.com. Please link to this article rather than copying and pasting it onto your site (which would be unauthorized and illegal).

Google
 
Web useless-knowledge.com

Useless-Knowledge.com © Copyright 2002-2006. All rights reserved.